U.S. is not happy with BC’s underpriced lumber exports
October 9th, 2010 | Posted in Softwood Lumber Dispute | 3 comments »
The United States has requested consultation with Canada under the Softwood Lumber Agreement. At issue is the apparent unfair under-pricing of timber harvested from public lands in the Interior region of British Columbia.
The U.S. feels that British Columbia is providing to softwood lumber producers a low-cost input for their products and circumventing the export measures provided for in the Softwood Lumber Act. Specifically at issue is the increased harvest of pine beetled killed timber at a reduced stumpage rate.
British Columbia has lowered their stumpage rate on pine beetle killed timber to $0.25 cents per cubic metre to encourage usage of the timber before the quality is too degraded.
When a consultation is requested, under the Softwood Lumber Agreement, an dispute settlement process is established allowing Canada and the U.S. to each share their views with the goal of coming to a resolution.
Madison’s Lumber Reporter interviewed Pat Bell, BC’s Minister of Forests and Range. Bell said, “It is very disappointing that President Obama is talking about pulling down trade barriers, yet the US administration is entering into an arbitration over something that is clearly grandfathered into the 2006 SLA. BC has not changed any of its harvest practices since the signing of the SLA. It is no big secret that the longer the beetle kill timber is dead the less suitable it is for lumber purposes. Forest companies in BC are doing the best they can with a very poor log grade.”
The consultation process is 40 days long. If no resolution is reach within 40 days, and both sides admit this is unlikely, then the US Coalition for Fair Lumber Importssoft is expected to expedite their claim for arbitration from an international court.
Read more:
US Requests Canadian Softwood Lumber Consultation (Madison’s Lumber Reporter)
United States Requests Consultations with Canada under Softwood Lumber Agreement (Office of the United States Trade Representative)
Related Posts
- British Columbia's lumber producers have filed their statement of defense in latest softwood lumber round
- Resolute Forest Products sells 25,000 acres of land to Nova Scotia
- Softwood lumber act to be extended to 2015
- Forest Products Assocation of Canada pleased with extension to Softwood Lumber Agreement
- US claiming BC's coastal loggers are violating the softwood lumber agreement
- Softwood lumber export tax to be reduced on June 1
3 Responses to U.S. is not happy with BC’s underpriced lumber exports
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.




Here we go again. The States aren’t happy, so bend over Canada. There has never been a thing called ” Free Trade”. If Canada or Mexico make something cheaper-the U.S. either closes its’ borders to it, fights in in court or puts tarrifs on it. Canada got screwed by signing this so called “Free Trade” agreement because it came tangled up with a thousand strings attached. These strings allow the U.S. to manipulate and challenge the deal whenever they see fit-which is whenever a product is made cheaper than what they can make it. British Columbia must find other costumers-the Asian market, China, Japan etc. Screw the Americans.
Well,just who do you think is actually running this country anyway? Ottawa? Don’t think so.
I am convinced that if one were to be able to dig deep enough,you will find an American Puppeteer pulling the strings of this country.
It is not unusual to be sitting in miles and miles of untouched forest and still the price of a 2X4 will break your wallet….what’s with that?
Our Tar Sands has a pipe line running straight to the US but we pay more for gas? But then again…we already sell them our hydro and then buy it back at a higher cost…
We have always been and always will be a subservient provider of resources to the US.
If we EVER have the guts to deal with other countries and grow a pair of “chins” you can be sure their media will be airing stories about us having Weapons of Mass Destruction.
I completely agree with you. Every word!