Ontario's Forests. Ontario's Future.
Sep 1, 2009 | In Woodlands | 23 feedbacks »
The public will play a key role in helping Ontario’s forest industry balance economic success with sustainable practices.
Released on August 27th, 2009, Ontario’s Forests, Ontario’s Future is a discussion paper that will guide both online public comment and a series of consultations that begin next month.
The paper deals with how the province should modernize forest tenure and pricing – the system it uses to determine how wood supplies are licensed, allocated and priced, as well as the associated legal obligations.
A series of stakeholder and public consultations has been scheduled as follows:
Sault Ste. Marie - Sep 17
Timmins - Sep 22
Hearst - Sep 24
Dryden - Sep 29
Thunder Bay - Oct 1
Marathon - Oct 6
Huntsville - Oct 13
Pembroke - Oct 14
(Visit Ontario's Forests. Ontario's Future. for times and locations)
Additional sessions will be held with Aboriginal organizations and communities.
Read the discussion paper:
http://www.foresttenure.mndmf.gov.on.ca/pdfs/Tenure-Discussion.pdf
23 comments
I laugh everytime the Ontario Government says it will study the issue - I am no longer in the employment of a paper/forest company - however I am now part of a new endangered specie, they are called forest industry employees - when I started in the paper industry in the mid eighties - there were 10 pulp and paper mills and numerous lumber mills in Northwestern Ontario - I think now you can count on one hand both and soon you won't need any hands to count. It is funny though when it is south of Sudbury things take on a whole new meaning when industries are in trouble - oh well like my dad told me many, many years ago - when you only have about 2 to 5% of the voting population why would they care. They don't need us to win elections - heck people in Southern Ontario don't even know what is North of Barry, Ontario. All this will do is give the appearance that this government cares - don't get me wrong - it wouldn't matter which party would be in power you would get the same response and the same amount of caring. So what to do - to tell you the truth - I don't know - but I think if we got the same help the auto industry did and does - we would probably still have most mills operating - but I guess we will never know, because we will never be treated like the people are in Southern Ontario.
The Ontario Gov is so sure of it that it just gave $829,000.00 to the Tagamon Nation (Kenora district)in order to prepare the First Nation Community for the development of one of two wood processing plants for The Two Feathers Products Initiative.Also, our Ont Gov gave the Namaygoosisagagun First Nation $563,135.00 to complete the construction of a sawmill and small business centre.
And here I thought we here in Northern Ontario were being ignored..shame on me.
Please explain how compliance monitoring of harvesting practices by the industry has led us to where we are today. You would be aware that there is ongoing monitoring by MNR, independent forest audits every 5 years, and more recently, the monitoring associated with certification audits.
Most corporations are looking short term (ie: 5 years max), as those who manage them have their eye on the ball....that is (drum roll please.....) their BONUSES!!! This fact has got us where we are today (fibre shortage).
In addition, cut-backs by the MNR has exasperated and perpetuated this situation. Agreed that MNR does monitor these companies, but NOT at the level that it really needs to.
It is all well and good to believe that total compliance exists and I commend you for that. But I'm sorry, that simply isn't the case. Granted it could be worse, but it is far from being perfect, or effective. Case in point, the forest industry, the nuclear industry, the fisheries industry.....I could go on.....
Just to clarify, I never said that total compliance exists and I never would. Just pointing out that it has nothing to do with wood supply and certainly nothing to do with the topic of this thread.
And believe me, I'm not sure about a rosy future either. There had to be a correction (too much mill capacity in NW Ontario for available wood). I think it was inevitable for some mills to go down permanently.
Nevertheless, living in a small community that has been devestated by the forestry downturn, I think there could be some hope for the future with some tenure reform and increased opportunities for some smaller players. Anything to get the economy going and house prices back close to what they were would be very welcome.
Have a good one.
Comments are not allowed from anonymous visitors.
| « AbitibiBowater completes sale of 121,000 hectares of Quebec timberlands | Canada's forest and paper sector losses slowed in Q2 of 2009: PricewaterhouseCoopers » |


